Brand
    • Home
    • Blog
    • About
    • FAQ
    • Think Rootclaim's Wrong?
    • 5 Flaws of Human Reasoning
    • How Rootclaim Works
    • Rootclaim's Track Record
    • The Rootclaim Challenge
Rootclaim Blog

syria2013evidence

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

*

*

  • Explore Rootclaim

Recent Posts

  • New evidence resolves the controversy surrounding the 2013 Syria sarin attack
  • Rootclaim shifts to agile, simplified analyses
  • $100,000 Debate Challenge: Chemical Attack in Syria
  • $100,000 Challenge Following Recent Covid-19 Studies
  • Vitamin D Can Likely End the COVID-19 Pandemic

Recent Comments

  • Rebecca on New evidence resolves the controversy surrounding the 2013 Syria sarin attack
  • John Smith on New evidence resolves the controversy surrounding the 2013 Syria sarin attack
  • Michael Kobs on New evidence resolves the controversy surrounding the 2013 Syria sarin attack
  • Frank de Groot on When Logic Goes Wrong: Survival Guide
  • Hind Abyad on $100,000 Debate Challenge: Chemical Attack in Syria

Tags

Ad Hominem analysis Appeal to Authority Autism Bayesian inference network Bolt challenges chemical attack Circular Reasoning conventional wisdom Covid-19 deductive reasoning Dependence Essence evidence Fallacy of Presumption Fallacy of Relevance false binary false dichotomy False dilemma ghouta Hae Min Lee hair heuristics khan sheikhun Logic Logical fallacies lottery Malaysia Airlines 370 Measles MH17 MH370 MMR policy Probability Probability theory proof Red herring Rootclaim Sarin Storyline assumptions Strawman syria Trump Vaccine

About Rootclaim

Rootclaim is a collaborative analysis platform that transforms how people understand complex issues by combining the power and reach of crowdsourced information with the mathematical validity of Bayesian statistics.

Cover image credit: "Cross section of a trees’ roots." by Aaron Escober, has been modified, used under CC BY 2.0

© 2021 Rootclaim Blog

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑